If you want to do serious macro photography on a budget, then this lens is an excellent option. This lens is the little brother of the Canon 100mm f/2.8 L lens, which is slightly sharper and has better build quality.īut just because there is a more expensive version of this lens does not take away from the value of this excellent and sharp portrait and macro lens. Given it's sharpness, fast aperture, and convenient focal length, it also makes a nice portrait lens. This one, however, adds macro capabilities which means it can focus very close to the camera.īut this lens is not only for macro photography. You decided between the 85mm f/1.8 and the 100mm f/2, but now there is a third option with a similar fast aperture and similar focal length. In general, I'd recommend the 100mm for full frame cameras (5D Mark III or 6D, for example) and the 85mm f/1.8 for crop sensor portraits (like the Canon Rebels, 70d, etc.)Ĭheck current prices for the Canon 100mm f/2 on Amazon. The features on the face become flatter and more flatterING when shooting with a longer focal length, but photos shot with a slightly shorter focal length have a more intimate feel. If you are shooting exclusively portraits, it is difficult to choose between the 85 and the 100. This is a great option for indoor sports because it is ridiculously fast and is a good focal length for “close” sports where you can get right up to the sidelines like swimming, wrestling, tennis, some basketball games, etc.Īside from indoor sports, this lens is fantastic for portraits as well. It's just about as fast and sometimes the extra 15mm can make a real difference for indoor sports. So now the question–which one do I pick?!?!? My rule is this: if you EVER shoot indoor sports, you want the 100mm f/2. In terms of build quality, value, and sharpness, these lenses are both about equal. The Canon 100mm f/2 is the twin sister of the 85mm f/1.8 lens mentioned previously, but this one was born 15mm later. The image stabilized version is significantly more expensive, but the optical quality is similar between the two versions.Ĭlick here to check the price of the less expensive non-IS version on Amazon, or else you can click here for the much more expensive version with IS on Amazon Both are “L” glass, but one has image stabilization and one doesn't. There are two 70-200mm f/4 lenses available for the Canon system. This is probably the most popular lens for photographers buying their first professional-grade “L” lens (Canon's marker for their professional quality lenses). If you haven't used professional lenses before, you may not appreciate just how heavy they are, so saving weight by choosing this f/4 lens is a significant benefit over the $2,500 f/2.8 version of this lens. In fact, many professional photographers who have used the 70-200mm f/2.8 for years are now switching over to this f/4 version to save some money and to lighten their load. The fast aperture will give you great results all the way through the lens to the edge of the photo. To have an f/4 maximum aperture is not entirely negative in fact, it gives you a lighter lens than the f/2.8 version with nearly equal optical quality. Before you get lost in your excitement over the price of this Canon lens, notice that the f/stop only goes down to f/4 instead of the much-desired f/2.8 version of this lens (which costs about $2,500 dollars!).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |